Rutgers In New York 2003
In the early 1960's, Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey, had one of the most prestigious art departments in the
country-a reputation that continues to this day. From the start,
the program at Rutgers was dedicated to progressive avant-garde
practices. Whereas other important schools during this period
were heavily influenced by the formalist doctrines of Clement
Greenberg, Rutgers' art pedagogy was formulated from Meyer
Schapiro's Marxism (via Allan Kaprow), mixed with Eastern
philosophies (via Black Mountain, John Cage, and D.T. Suzuki),
Fluxus anticommercialism (via Robert Watts and Geoff Hendricks),
and the gritty vernacular reality of central New Jersey (George
Segal).
Artists at Rutgers were true innovators, scholars, and writers
showing at the Rueben, Green, Hansa, Castelli, Martha Jackson,
Bianchini and Ferus galleries - some of the most prominent
American venues during this period. Allan Kaprow coined the word
Happenings, and Lucas Samaras, Robert Whitman, Watts, and George
Brecht (a friend of Watts and chemist from nearby Johnson and
Johnson who made assemblages and events) were early performers
and most important practitioners of this theatrical art. Because
Roy Lichtenstein and Segal created their seminal works in New
Brunswick during 1960-61, Rutgers has the only art department in
America with legitimate claims to the creation of American Pop
Art. Of the thirteen artists shown in Art 1963/The New
Vocabulary, the first east coast Pop Art exhibit, five (George
Brecht, Allan Kaprow, Roy Lichtenstein, George Segal, and Robert
Watts) were affiliated with Rutgers.1
In fact, the Rutgers group was not only one of the first to
have direct involvement with Pop Art and Happenings, but also one
of the first to be involved with Fluxus, kinetic sculpture,
intermedia, performance, Minimalism, and Post-Minimalism. That
early heritage has been written about extensively and is beyond
the scope of this brochure.2
The Department of Visual Arts' established a reputation was as
a breeding ground for innovative sculptors, conceptualists, and
performance artists early on.3 Rather than making a specific
genre of sculpture (such as the welded steel Smith-Caro tradition
at Bennington College in the 1960s), Rutgers sculptors worked
with new materials and figuration and created multimedia
environments that incorporated real space, sound, and light. This
was radically different from formalist sculpture with a defined
style and praxis. Each Rutgers artist developed his or her own
singular image from mass culture, vernacular information, and
from within; creating personal methods of defining spatial and
material essence, innovative ways of approaching events and
redefining culture. Rutgers sculpture paralleled the real world.
It was multivalent and theatrical, based on experience and art-
less (at least initially.) Thus Watts' early kinetic and sound
assemblages disclosed his engineering background, Segal's figures
jut out from a plane like a Cubist collage in actual space, and
Gary Kuehn's early work was workman-like and revealed memories of
industrial accidents. Jackie Winsor cited her father's carpentry
as a source for her early constructions with obsessive nailing.
Artists at Rutgers used eccentric materials-who else other than
Watts, Keith Sonnier and Joan Snyder used flocking to make high
art? The Rutgers group always asked, "What is high art? How is
the hegemony created?" Rutgers' strength was in grasping the
esthetic core in the quotidian.
The formation of the Mason Gross School of the Arts in 1976
changed the intimate character of the school while increasing its
professionalism, stressing greater diversity, emphasizing
critical theory, offering state of the art facilities, and
increasing studio spaces for students. Carolee Schneeman, the
first woman hired in the art department, was followed by an
impressive roster of female artists including Emma Amos, Judith
Brodsky, Lauren Ewing, Ardele Lister, Diane Neumeier, Martha
Rosler, and Joan Semmel. One of America's finest printmaking
facilities, the Rutgers Center for Innovative Print and Paper,
was developed by Brodsky. Photography, film, and graphic design
were incorporated into the curriculum. The consolidation of
Livingston College's Department of Visual Arts with Mason Gross
brought the talents and activism of Leon Golub and Mel Edwards.
Recently surveying studios and slides of recent alumni, I
noted a new emergence of painterly painting, both figurative and
abstract, at Mason Gross (undoubtedly due to the influence of
Joan Semmel, Hanneline Rogeberg, Tom Nozkowski, Suzanne Joelson,
and Steve DiBennedeto) and the heavy influence of digital
technology (in painting, photography, and video). These artists
have a fluency with technology that matches the use of
sketchbooks by earlier generations.
Looking closely at an alumni list I was also struck by the
number of major curators and dealers with Rutgers affiliations. I
don't think other accounts have noted this. For example, Robert
Bianchi, Jack Flam, Stuart Horodner, Joseph Jacobs, Nina Jacobs,
Robert Miller, Tom Moran, Ronald Onorato, Linda Weintraub, and
James Yohe are all well-known museum professionals, art
administrators, or dealers. The noted art historian Patricia
Leighten revolutionized our understanding of Cubism; Leighten,
the slide librarian at Douglass College when I was a graduate
student, was always open to photographing another Becher or
Nauman. Kathleen Ryan is the photo editor of The New York Times
Magazine and Sherry Conkleton, a noted photo curator.
This winter, I visited every graduate and undergraduate studio
at Mason Gross that invited me to look at work. The Visual Arts
faculty suggested a pool of recent graduates from which I made
additional selections. Given space and exhibition constraints, I
could not easily incorporate large works or complex
installations. I have included a few Rutgers artists of note
(George Segal, Roy Lichtenstein, and Joan Snyder) not as tokens,
but as a testament and standard to the quality that Rutgers
generates. Since this is a group exhibition of available work, I
selected for a viable show, something that coheres and works
visually in the space. This is different than a retrospective or
a thematic project. These factors defined curatorial selections.
The choices were difficult, idiosyncratic, but honed by several
decades of gallery work. Another curator would have undoubtedly
made different selections.
Recent graduates include Diane Bonder, Heather Freeman,
Jackson Lenochan, Elizabeth Line, Clifford Owens, Aaron Williams,
and the collaboration of Ellen Lesperance and Jeanine Oleson.
Bonder is a consummate personal filmmaker whose Closer to Heaven
is an elegy to her father. Line makes installations of small
collages on house paint chips, like a marriage of Richard Tuttle
and Ellsworth Kelly. Freeman and Lenochan recycle signs in ironic
and political ways. Owens's videos are arch, aggressive, (gross)
and funny cultural in-jokes. William's paintings counter an
organic illusionistic space with "modernist" flatness to
disconcerting effect.
A parallel ritualistic universe of performed activities, at
once contemporary and timeless, is documented in large scale
photographs by Lesperance and Oleson.
Current graduate works in this exhibition include Wendy
White's sculpture, which resembles a combination Franz
West/Jessica Stockholder/Bambara fetish. Brian Benfer made a
linear gesture in hydrocal and asphaltum that harkens back to
process art like Sonnier. Zachariah Rockhill's self-effacing
self-portrait video with running paint covering his head mocks a
Colorfield painting as it references and updates performances
such as Jim Dine's The Smiling Workman. A sense of post-punk
absurdity is reflected in the performance videos and
constructions of Lucas Kelly. Mara Faye Lethem's impassioned
photograph Pain Survey, with the euphonious phrase scratched
right into the negative, speaks strongly of personal angst.
William Ortega's large black and white self-portrait with Barbie
doll body acknowledges the Metro Pictures group as it
deconstructs Hispanic machismo. Ligia Bouton makes cojoined
vestments that are awkwardly worn and performed in by two
persons. Yet I selected photos from her Recreation of a Deer Day
series that are equally real and surreal, like dioramas or
Duchamp's Etant Donnes.
Justin Adian, Coleen Fox, Wes Sherman, and Erin Thurlow all
contribute abstract paintings that hold their own with any
currently shown in New York. Adian's paintings for example, mix
an Arte Povera sensibility with the subtle warped geometries of
New Yorkers such as Robert Mangold. Fox makes sensitive, almost
palpable fields. Sherman's paintings usually deal with complex
color and figure ground relationships-I selected an atypical
overall yellow field. Thurlow's Nite of the Hunter references the
classic Agee film as well as his process of night walking with a
digital camera in the course of hunting imagery. The linear
vertical pattern derives from a curtain. A gestural, gutsy
geometry built up with punchy color typifies the paintings of
Jasmine Justice. I have selected Melissa Bebee's intimate, almost
Vuillard-like, interior knowing full-well her repertoire includes
large exotic installations.
Katrina Bello's sensitive biomorphic drawings and paintings
and Geoffrey Trapp's self-portrait, a homage to John Travolta
film characters, are among the standout works by talented
undergraduates. Marisa Tsikitas' paintings are colorful,
exuberant, expressionist, and mildly kitsch. Eve Schneider's
anti-monumental mini-monuments (remember
Giacometti's year-long production in a matchbox?) and
medicinal color charts, and Syd Olshfski's abstractions show
promise. Many of these artists already have strong signature
styles and they hold their own with the graduates.
Mason Gross School of the Arts will continue to influence the
art world because of these talents and because of the recognition
of the achievements in the past. It's a continuum, and a proud
heritage. Off the top, these student works may include the future
masters of the Rutgers Tradition. Take a close look and enjoy!
---- Sid Sachs, April 2003
Notes
1. The date in the title of this show is a misnomer; the
exhibition took place at the Gershman YHMA in Philadelphia in
October 1962, six weeks before Sidney Janis' New Realism
exhibition, which historically is credited. There would have been
more Rutgers connections - Letty Eisenhauer was suggested by
curator Billy Kluver but nixed by a local committee. Eisenhauer,
an integral performer in early Happenings by Kaprow, Claes
Oldenburg, Ben Patterson etc. showed at the Y several seasons
later. See Sid Sachs "Destination: Broad and Pine" and other
essays by Constance W. Glenn and Cheryl Harper in Harper, A
Happening Place (Philadelphia: The Galleries at the Gershman Y,
2003).
2. For examples, see Joan Marter, Rutgers University and the
Avant-Garde, 1957-1963 (Newark: The Newark Museum 1999), 15
Degrees from Rutgers; Charting New Directions in Contemporary Art
(New Brunswick: Mason Gross School of Art, 1996), Benjamin H.D.
Buchloh and Judith F. Rodenbeck, Experiments in the Everyday;
Allan Kaprow and Robert Watts, Events, Objects, Documents (New
York: Columbia University, 1999 and Geoffrey Hendricks, Critical
Mass (Amherst: Mead Art Museum 2003).
3. For example Alice Aycock, Chaikia Booker, Cheryl Dunye, Mel
Edwards, Lauren Ewing, John Goodyear, Geoffrey Hendricks, Gary
Kuehn, Larry Miller, Robert Morris, Rita Myers, Linda Nishio,
Charles Ray, Lucas Samaras, George Segal, Charles Simonds, Mimi
Smith, Keith Sonnier, Patrick Strzelec, Ted Victoria, Robert
Watts, Robert Whitman, Jacqueline Winsor, etc.
|
|